Image Credit: Printable World History Timeline Chart

I used to think The Fourth Turning was a revolutionary idea.

The groundwork for The Strauss-Howe Generational Theory was first laid out in the titular William Strauss’ and Neil Howe’s Generations: The History of America’s Future in 1991, but I didn’t pick up on it until much later. Something about 2016 made me curious about where we were all heading….

It cleanly grabbed my attention with how it so intuitively described the feeling of unease and chaos we were all in, and when the pandemic his a few years later I was completely sold on it. Every 80 years or so, about four generations, there is a period of disaster and turmoil that one generation would take the burden of resolving. For our Fourth Turning, which started in 2001, it was the global war on terror, a pandemic, the rise of fascism, global economic upheaval, and the climate...

I just got back from an amazing vacation with Leah to Los Angeles, and I’m feeling inspired. But, is it enough?

A few days ago, we sat down for dinner with a new colleague who lives and breathes LA. It was our first time meeting him, so we wanted to be careful about the topics we discussed, but of course, eventually we landed for a few minutes on the devastating LA fires.

It was weird being out there in LA on vacation while the fires were still raging a few miles away in different directions. Here we were, enjoying the city as best as we could, while others were fleeing their homes and neighborhoods as up-to 100 mph winds dispersed hot embers through the air.

We showed him a photo, the one below, that we took when we were on Santa Monica’s beach watching four helicopters fly towards a nearby area still raging. Was it right for us to be walking on the pier while that was happening...

A man posts rage-bait on social media, admitting that he does it because it gets him more engagement than being authentic and kind. This is what I thought:

We are the same people now that we were as children, just in older bodies and with more words to express ourselves with. There’s a classic experiment done with children you might be familiar with: Do you want one marshmallow now, or two marshmallows later?

But, it’s hard to quantify “later” as a child or as an adult. Is “later” near or far? Will we get something that satisfies our desires, or something that doesn’t even scratch the itch? What if the thing I get later isn’t actually enough for me? Won’t that mean I just wasted time waiting for it? I don’t want to waste time, I want what I want NOW.

We eat the one marshmallow. Sacrificing long-term joy for temporary satisfaction, or, at least, the hope that we’ll be temporarily...

Years ago, I read an article by sci-fi author John Scalzi that mentioned one of his strategies for writing a great novel. It was a short comment, but it’s stuck with me over a decade later:

Whenever he’s finished with a section of the story he’s telling, he goes back through and he asks “Why?” and “How?” something works the way it does. Whether it’s a character’s decision to go to a meeting, the way a spaceship’s engine works, or why two neighbors don’t like each other, he asks those questions.

And when he comes up with an answer, he asks those questions again.

Like a toddler that just learned that those two words even exist.

He does this at least two layers deep, and if the answers are satisfactory he keeps them in the story (well, I’m sure there are exceptions).

An Example of How This Works

Story point: The enderman stepped through his front door and hit his head on the...

A few weeks ago I was talking with a friend about your typical controversial topics like vaccines and the government. He’s that type of friend that I can enjoy sparring with on tough topics: Even though I think he’s a fool sometimes (and he rightly believes I am as well), at least we have a mutual respect during our conversations. I genuinely have love for the guy.

After some time during that chat, though, I realized that he wasn’t being entirely honest. There’s a lot of context that I’ll skip over, but put simply he believed that the government was evil because it was mandating COVID vaccines that Pfizer, Moderna, and other companies could make money off of. On the other hand, my friend believed that Rand Paul should be applauded for finding a way to use his position in the government to make money off of COVID remdesivir treatments.

When this dissonance was brought to his attention...

Whenever I watch a film, I’m always trying to figure out what the intended tone of the Director is and judge it based on that alone.

Whether or not the characters are likeable or there are plot holes or anything like that is secondary to me. If a film has a tone that doesn’t take itself seriously, then plot holes don’t matter. If it’s clearly just a brainless action movie, then thoughtless characters don’t bother me. But if it was directed with the intention of making me bear some heavy emotional weight, then it had better earn that emotional weight by making every action of the characters believable.

Archive, written and directed by Gavin Rothery, clearly wants us to feel heavy emotional weight. For the most part it accomplishes that. The slower pace of the scenes allow us to sit in the thoughts of the characters, even those who only “think” programmatically. The scenery is...